Massive Volga divorce fraud-scandal:  Rich Lutheran adulterer Gerald  Jensen accused of hiding vast tracts of land assets.  Preacher says Bible full of errors, that adultery/fornication "not dirty." Church Elder says dark skinned people "not American."  Brookings DA, Judge, Supreme Court Chief Justice Craig Jensen and Newspaper coverup related racist hate crime, police torture, near murder (read below).

The Trial of Jacob The Hutter

This is read all over the world.  Keep passing on link.  Local newspapers (including Gannett) too terrified (or complicit) to print.  They New York Times has had the story for almost two years now--they too are biding their time.  And I have many more foxes in hand, their tails yet to be tied.  Everything you read here has been in the Governor's hands for over a year, so the coverup goes to the very top.  

A Troika of Terror, Torture, and Near Murder by South Dakota Police, State Attorneys, and Judges:  Chief Justice (Supreme Court, SD) Craig Jensen and the Coverup of the Racist Hate Crime of the Volga Lutheran Adulterer Gerald Jensen and his hate-woman partner, the Lutheran Hate-Woman Intermill.  

Almost 100 years ago, my father's family fled this very region to Canada when he was but 8 months old, because of these murderers, or rather, the fathers of these murderers, who are merely carrying on where their fathers left off.  Chief Justice Craig Jensen knows where the bodies are, which is why he is forced to cover up the murderous hate crime of this notorious anti-Hutterite racist, the Volga adulterer Gerald Jensen (I have so far said nothing specifically about Commissioner Jensen, although I have many Sampson foxes in hand and if you read carefully below you will be able to tie tail to tail) and his partner the hate-woman Intermill, which saw me terrorized by the Brookings police for ten years, tortured, and almost murdered--the Brownshirt Register and the Argus Fuhrer being too criminally complicit to print.  These murderers lack but the Bonfire of Jacob Hutter.  Chief Justice Craig Jensen is covering up the racist hate crime of the adulterer Gerald Jensen, because he is covering up the murderous hate crime of his fathers, which caused my family to flee this very region to Canada almost 100 years ago. I can show you where the bodies are.  Chief Justice Craig Jensen knows where the bodies are (see below), which is why he has to cover up the hate-crime of the adulterer Gerald Jensen. Almost one hundred years ago my father’s family fled this region for Canada when he was but eight months old, because of these very same racist murderers (rather their fathers, though given the rate of divorce and adultery here few could possibly know who their real fathers are--their preachers are but divorce-pimps who tell their congregants that the Bible is full of errors, their assemblies little more than Sunday morning wife-swaps-- few could possibly know who their fathers really are).  I sense real fear in the Sheriff every time he sees me approaching.  He undoubtedly sees behind me the looming shadow of a Federal Prosecutor, because Chief Justice Craig Jensen is covering up the racist hate crime of the Brookings County adulterer Gerald Jensen and his partner, the hate-woman Intermill.  Why the coverup?  Because racist Hut-baiting continues to be the regional pastime honed by their fathers, and Chief Justice Craig Jensen is not about to start criminalizing the regional sport of his fathers.  “You need a lawyer,” the Sheriff cries every time I confront him with ten years of the Brookings police acting the Gestapo (I accused the judge of this in Court), terrorizing me at the behest of this adulterer (who boasts of having the Sheriff in his pocket, and proved it--see below), and the $100,000 I was threatened with by the racist gangsters who squat in the State Attorney’s office:  Gangsters Dan Nelson, Austin Augstin, and Benjamin Kleinjan, who framed me on falsified evidence and tried to blackmail me into cutting a deal by threatening me with a $100,000 judgment (for pruning trees which I planted and paid taxes on for 25 years) all the while hiding from the Federal Government that they had Vandal I in hand and disappeared him in order to engage in the racist Hut-baiting of their fathers that caused my father’s family to flee this region 100 years ago.  All you see on this site has been read and known throughout the political, legal and Unified Justice System of South Dakota for almost two years now.  I have watched them read everything you see here for weeks on end from sd.gov websites. Which is why Chief Justice Craig Jensen is committing a Federal Crime by covering up the racist hate crime of the Volga adulterer Gerald Jensen and his partner, the hate-woman Intermill, which saw me terrorized, tortured and almost murdered by the Brookings police.  All of which is widely known throughout the Unified Justice of South Dakota over which Chief Justice Craig Jensen presides, which is why I have called him a “a murderous fraud” in offical documents (see official Appeals, Briefs, etc., on this site).  The New York Times recently raised the alarm of criminal State Attorneys who use their office to murder (they say “destroy”--Ahmaud Arbery was systematically murdered by Georgia state gangsterism, but unlike Georgia, here the only news you see is what hews to the party line, because the Argus Fuhrer and the Brownshirt Register do not cover racist Hut-baiting, the regional pastime of their fathers).  Which is why Chief Justice Craig  Jensen can get away with covering up the racist hate crime of the Volga adulterer and his partner, the hate-woman Intermill.  But I see real fear in the Sheriff every time he sees me approaching.  “You need a lawyer,” he cries.  “He’s telling me to get a lawyer,” I say to myself.  Because he knows Chief Justice Craig Jensen is sitting on multiple Federal Crimes which cannot be allowed to get out of South Dakota.  I accuse this Troika of Terror, Torture, and Near Murder (I was George Floyded by the Brookings Police–full account below, written the minute I got home) of the following Federal Crimes.

1. Ten years of police terror at the behest of the Volga adulterer Gerald Jensen, who boasts of having the Sheriff in his pocket, and proved it--see below.

2. Obstruction of Justice–they leapfrogged over Vandal I to frame Vandal II, and falsified the evidence to disappear Vandal I. This is what the corrupt Third Circuit is covering up.

3. False Arrest–they stalked me into my bank and arrested me on suspicion of bank robbery. I”m the only person in the history of the world arrested for bank robbery, when I was putting money into the bank.  I have repeatedly accused (in official documents) this Troika of Murder of being worse than Heydrich, Himmler, and Hitler, as those murderers at least had the decency to wear armbands when they murdered you, and not drape themselves in the Constitution.  "You wouldn't recognize the Constitution from Mein Kampf," I accuse them on record as you can see below. They have no law here.  These murderers make up the law as they go.  I'm the only person in the history of the world to be arrrested for bank robbery while putting money into the bank.  Mir Niks, dir Niks, all par for the course for these corrupt racist murderers.  

4. Police torture.  When I asked for the handcuffs to be less tight they screamed “bend over, bend over,”--so they could see without having to bend down to look. All this in front of a leering crowd as if they were reenacting the bonfire of Jacob Hutter, fittingly right in the shade of the two major Sunday Morning Wife-Swaps where the preach the Whiteousness by Fate Alone and the doctrine of White Selection and the preordamnation of all "the Sons of Darkness,"--all the better to whitewash the sepulchers and crimes of their fathers.   Then, with my hands tightly handcuffed behind my back they threw me into a stiflingly hot police cruiser until I screamed in pain and panic, and told me I would get relief if “I cooperated.” When I told this murderer of a judge that this is the CIA definition of torture and that she was obligated to present this information to the Federal Government, she sniffed, “Not credible.”  I screamed for my life, but “Not credible.” Any doctor (and my medical records) will tell you that I have a severe breathing disorder and stop breathing in a crunched up position.  For almost two years now I have demanded in official documents of this Troika of Murder that this information be presented to the Federal Government in keeping with the 1st Amendment "right of the people...to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."  The racist murderers have colluded to keep this from reaching the Federal Government.  This is the Federal Crime Chief Justice Craig Jensen is covering up, because these police only had “the Hut” in-hand once again, and racist Hut-baiting is the regional pastime.  Im Westen nichts Neues.

5. Criminal Negligent Near Murder.  My heart was racing at such a pace that I would have been dead had I not screamed in panic.  This the murderers are withholding from the Federal Government. This is the Federal Crime of Chief Justice  Craig Jensen.

6. Miscarriage of Justice–I was ambushed in court and forced to undergo a trial of which I had absolutely no knowledge.  State Gangster Kleinjan even brazenly told the Court that they had to resort to an aborted trial, and that I could not be informed of the trial, lest I boycott the trial.  In my appeal, I repeatedly demonstrate from the trial transcript that the Volga adulterer Gerald Jensen lied repeatedly under oath.  They (the Third Circuit) covered it up. I accuse these criminal gangsters on the Third Circuit of sanctioning aborted justice.  This was not a trial. It was an ambush. What began as the regional pastime of Hut-baiting has now snowballed into a mountain of Federal Crimes which Chief Justice is covering up, because he doesn’t think the Hut-baiting pastime of his fathers should be considered a crime.

7. Criminal Violation of the 14th Amendment.  This Troika of Murder had Vandal I in hand, and disappeared him, because their only intent here was to commit a racist hate crime. That is, frame “the Hut.”  

8.  Armed Robbery and Extortion.  This is where I see real fear in the Sheriff.   They tried to blackmail me with a $100,000 judgment for pruning trees which I planted, pruned, and paid taxes on for 25 years.  “But you know there were two of us,” I tell the Sheriff.  “Don’t I have the right not to pay someone else’s $50,000?  How is this not armed extortion?”  “You need a lawyer,”  he cries.  Everything you read here has been read in Washington.  As he knows.  But the Unified Justice System (SD) is unified in keeping all this from the Federal Government.  

9.  Coverup–everything you read here has been read for weeks on end by officials on sd.gov websites. Every Brookings County official has read it repeatedly.  On cue, they all cover-up police torture and near murder.  I have the logs to prove it. It has been read by most law professors down in Vermillion (not a few of them read from various US and Canadian cities).  They can’t believe anything like this could happen in America.  If what happened to me on June 28, 2021 was done to a foreign terrorist, in a foreign country, the nation would be in an uproar, Congress would demand hearings, and the UN would cry “barbaric Amerika” nonstop.  Here it’s business as usual for these racist murderers, who are now using armed coercion to enrich their rich patrons–over $6000 for pruning my own trees, and they are hiding from the Federal Government that there were two of us.  My father fled these racist murderers 100 years ago, our land abandoned and the house he was born in vacant for 100 years.  When the neighboring children ask what those buildings are, they are told, “The Huts were driven out of Romania.” They came here to establish a colony and abandon it to show that “the Huts were driven out of Romania.”  This is why Chief Justice Craig Jensen is covering up the racist hate crime of the Brookings County adulterer, Gerald Jensen and his partner, the hate-woman Intermill.  I have never seen him commit adultery.  The people from the local Sunday Morning Wife-Swap always stop by to tell me who he’s taking up with after casting off his wife, and (his brother tells me) cheating her by hiding his assets, his lawyer, who had hands in both their pockets, now glibly telling her that what’s done is done. “Woe unto you, lawyers, how shall you escape the damnation of Hell.”  The murderers lack but the bonfire of Jacob Hutter.  And all this has been known throughout the Unified Justice System (SD) for almost two years.  As long as I do not file charges, no crime has been committed, and these murderers can get away with murder.  We were nt driven out of South Dakota, because we never filed charges claiming we were,  because as everyone knows "the Huts were driven out of Romania."  Chief Justice Craig Jensen is covering up that an American was tortured and almost murdered by the Brookings Police, that he was terrorized for ten years by the Brookings Police, that the Brookings Police colluded with the State Attorneys to falsify evidence in order to facilitate the racist hate crime of the Volga adulterer and his partner, the hate-woman Intermill,  that he is now having to resort to armed extortion (both halves) to hide the hate crime of the Volga adulterer and his partner, the hate woman Intermill.  This is why in official documents I exposed him as "a murderous fraud" for the record.  Because the murderers lack but the bonfire of Jacob Hutter.  

10.  Gross Criminal Negligence.  For almost two years now this racist troika of terror, torture and near murder has known that everything in the Warrant is based on falsified information and obstruction of justice.  Yet because they are now up to their necks in covering up a Federal hate crime, they had no choice but to allow a lethal police Warrant to stand against  an innocent American that they knew to be the object of a historic hate-crime.  Because Chief Justice Craig Jensen is covering up the hate crime of the adulterer Gerald Jensen to keep from uncovering the monstrous hate crime of his fathers.  I can show you where the bodies are.  He knows where the bodies are.  

------------------------

Beat Being Romans: Go Tell That Fox (officially filed 6-2-2022)

Against the Pillars  (Appeal filed 5-10-22)

Court Motion for Removal of State Attorney Dan Nelson for High Crimes and Misdemeanors filed 2-25-22 (official Court Motion here) 

What happened here is that the two richest people in the County got caught Hut-baiting and the Police,  the State Attorney,  the Courts,  and the Main Newspapers are covering up a historic Hate Crime.   I thank everyone for passing this site on  to their friends.   Every newspaper in South Dakota has seen everything you read here for almost a year.   When this breaks,   they will become the story.   The Press here,  including the Argus Fuhrer (a Gannet paper who has now blocked even my emails and whose criminal complicity will soon become a major feature in the story),   is no more than oligarch propaganda.  "Wait, I say,  on the Lord."

Appealing unto Caesar:  Supreme Court,  Grand Jury (or both)

“But Paul said unto them, They have beaten us openly uncondemned, being Romans, and have cast us into prison; and now do they thrust us out privily? nay verily; but let them come themselves and fetch us out” (Acts 16:37). 

So what would you do if someone in the neighborhood had the police and legal apparatus at their disposal to frame you with a crime?   Most Americans would tell you to just show up in court and "get it taken care off--you can't beat the system."  I show up with my Bible,  the truth,  and my Constitutional right that you cannot target one person and not another.   No lawyers.   If you read below,  you'll see police and Government legal depravity that would make Eichmann blush.   The Police/State Attorney/Judge know they were lied to but refuse to re-investigate.    They pretend to know nothing about the person who was with me throughout.  I'm prolonging the process to gain enough public exposure so that when I expose the criminal cover-up of the police and State Attorney at trial,  they will not be able to prevent this evidence from being presented:  their cover-up that there were two of us (the way the legal process works is that you cannot present evidence that does not exist--they pretend to know nothing of the second Vandal,  so he cannot exist.   And the Sheriff says he doesn't have to re-investigate,  even if it means I have to pay both halves of the $100,000 judgment.   Here I will accuse them of extortion).   This is the truth that will have to come out at the trial,  and which they will seek to suppress--just as they refuse to make one phone call that would reveal this to be a hate crime.   The judge and Government read everything that you see here (everything you read is as I read it off the back of my mind,  and a righteous man never has to worry about repeating himself).   Most Americans have become so hollowed out and fearful that they cannot imagine saying what you read here while having a gun pointed at my head (This is being read by law professors,  Washington,  South Korea,  and you over there in Istanbul--whoever you are,  welcome).   Having boycotted the trial (you can do that,  you say--I did),  gotten arrested again (you get used to that--this time they knew the world was watching),  appeared before the judge again (in my shabby coveralls),  and now the whole process has to start all over again—some of my friends thought my boycott would get me locked up for good.   I’m trying to find a way to excommunicate them temporarily,  for unlike the friends of Job,  I sense they suffer more than I do.   You get used to these things,  and soon begin to sense opportunity.  This thing is now a torpedo that missed the mark out there trying to find a target--I'm right behind it,  as Paul said,  "Nay,  verily!"  One would not wish to hurry these things:  "The kingdom of God cometh not by observation" because God takes His time forever.   So now we're into recusals—I spend very few  minutes trying to figure out how to file motions--for a Christian who shall judge angels, this is less than rubbish.   But once they’re filed they have the weight of Caesar,  and I hope to keep filing them all the way to the Supreme Court and Judge Garland, for “they have allowed themselves to be used as the Gestapo,  and beat us openly,  being Romans.”   (The Judge reads all this, imagine that).   Roman law, Paul knew,  was blind,  and a politician could easily get caught in its endless cogs.  Paul senses fear in these politicians--they got careless and assumed it would be business as usual.   

The law is an arsenal of swords,  and Jesus warns that the sword taken up can never be put down:  it always boomerangs,  if not on you,  then on your family-–look at the divorce rate in the Bible  Belt (consistently the highest in the country).   “Put up your sword”  is another way of saying “it is necessary that offenses come,  but woe to the man by whom they come.”  For long before God ordained the sword,  he ordained the damnation of those who will bear it.   Yet,  Jesus says,  God decreed that some must bear it.   Cain was the first “minister of God.”  The Antichrist will be the last.   The Church will never be more than a Remnant--and sheep at that.   And the 2nd Amendment is supposed to make up the difference here somehow?

“Nay,  verily.  Let them come fetch us out.”   The politicians knew they could be dragged to Rome for violating Roman law here.    Which is why they asked Paul and Silas to vanish.    But all they had to do was nothing in order to make their point--the politicians put violence in motion and now found themselves at the receiving end of it.   I show up in court with the Truth,  my Bible,  my Constitutional vouchers,  and ask God for the courage to “preach from the housetops.”   John the Baptist knew the consequences of preaching directly at Herod.   People end up shrieking in stadiums (to each other)  because they can't imagine speaking the truth whenever and wherever they are.   Most likely,   they're not quite certain that what they believe is not just another opinion.   "I believe,  and therefore I have spoken."   They have no conviction and so are at the mercy of Woke.   

Traveling yesterday,  I couldn’t believe the number of signs expressing fear of Covid mandates and “Trump 2024:  Save America.” Slogans and Stadiums.    They can’t get out of bed without wondering what sorts of permissions they need from the police and bureaucrats, and they want more Government?  They have become incapable of appearing in court over a traffic ticket without a lawyer,  for “you can’t beat the system.”   They  have simply lost the ability to “give an answer to every man”  on anything.   They can't think for themselves now,  and they want a Trump nanny state?    If only they can  get the right politician in there....

 So now I’m waiting to see where God is taking this,  and I must say,  I’m in the same mood as Paul when he said “and now they thrust us out privily?  Nay verily.”    Time is God’s instrument of choice.   In the saints,  it creates patience,  and an eternal inheritance,  for “in patience possess ye your souls.”   It’s the most  secretive element in the Universe,  withheld,  Jesus says,  even from the angels.   And no man has ever outwaited God,  for “their foot shall slide in due time.”    For the wicked,  the utter loss of control.   But for the godly,  patience is the control of time.  

Alcatraz Revisited:  Hutterite Accuses Government of Participating In and Covering up Hate-Crime,  Police Torture, Extortion (Brookings County, South Dakota.  Everything you read here has been submitted to the Federal Record of the U.S. Department of Justice–see Court Brief I).

1.  My earliest memory of "English" life is "Hut-Hut-Hut" walking next to my father in Cut Bank, Montana when I was four years old.  I had never seen or heard hate before--nor needed to be reminded of it after,  because the scene seared into my brain like a screen burn,  which in 60 years never once as much as flickered.   From then on I became subject to the same violent,  endless,  and feverish nightmare until I was about fifteen,  during which the screen never flickered and morning never came--a loud car with no muffler full of people screaming "Hut-Hut-Hut,"  the people  looking at us coldly as they passed us on the sidewalk,  and my father looking off into the distance as we walked to safety--the roaring car kept following us block after block--loudly lurching around the corner,  round and round,  "Hut-Hut-Hut"--for sixty years now we have been walking forever.    Some of you reading this will likely remember those days, because I see many of you in the frame passing us on the street.  Some of you write books trying to comprehend the moral/mental/religious state of those ordinary Germans in the background watching with cruel amusement at elderly Jews being prodded and displayed like livestock by their handlers in the public square.    Feel free to write your own chapter--the Germans will thank you.   "And let the Yids see to it,"  as Herr Speer used to smirk to Donitz.    What is done here is pure Hut-baiting--abetted by the Government.    It was the refrain that always met us on the streets in my earlier life (and beyond--read below).   We always considered ourselves fortunate that we fared no worse.    And now they are at it again.   

I accuse the Government of covering up the murderous hate crime of the hate criminal Gerald Jensen and his evil companion,  the hate woman Alice Intermill.  For nine years the Government has allowed itself to be used as the personal Gestapo of these hate murderers (the very first time they came out here I told them that the only reason they were sicced on me is because the two richest people in the county didn’t want a Hutterite as their neighbor).  As the Sheriff himself blurted out–the only crime here is “he hates you.”  What happened here is that the two richest people in the county got caught "Hut-baiting,"  the murderous sport that saw us almost exterminated (we were the Luther-Catholic-Calvin primer for the Holocaust) in Europe and made us flee to Canada almost 100 years ago when my father was eight months old.    They fled because they deemed this region too dangerous for their children.   My father fled.  I was within minutes of being murdered here by the Government.  Any doctor could tell you that I have a severe breathing disorder.   A few more minutes would have been fatal.  

2. I accuse the Government of humiliating, terrorizing, and torturing me on June 29 in front of my bank in Volga, South Dakota before a gawking crowd (it felt like a frame out of 1930’s Germany,  lacking only the Swastika on the bank logo behind me) and causing my near murder when they George Floyded me.   Any doctor could tell you what my medical records demonstrate:  that I have a severe breathing disorder (which is why I speak so poorly) that allows me to breathe only with great difficulty in normal conditions (I draw five breaths to your one,  and sometimes ten),  and often in stressful times in the summer’s heat,  I have to lie down and arrange my body to get enough breath to keep from passing out.  I would have been dead in minutes crunched up in a hot  cubicle with hands tightly handcuffed behind me and essentially sitting on my spine.  People who have survived being buried in a snow pit know that even though you can see the sky and hear people,  they cannot hear you,  because there is no oxygen down there–try as you might,  you cannot produce the slightest sound.  I screamed while I still had some oxygen in my lungs,  and when they let me out they told me I would get relief if I “cooperated”  (everything you read here has been known by the Government for months,  and,  as you can see in Court Brief I,  I have asked the Court to arrange so that  I can make a formal deposition of testimony and evidence before a Federal Magistrate,  and to submit everything you read on this site for the Federal record).   I had not moved a muscle during the whole ordeal,  and only quietly asked for the handcuffs to be less tight because they cut into my wrist bones.   “You know what your problem is,” they screamed,  “you’re not listening.   Bend over,  bend over” (so they could see if the handcuffs were really tight).  Meanwhile,  the gawking crowd was growing.   I thought I was back in 1930’s Germany.  Looking at those pictures as a child I naturally understood that they were Hutterites,  because I was taught our history in the cradle.  Just as I knew that the colony garden was the garden Gethsemani where Jesus ate the Last Supper,  and the tall pole (the Golgn) where we hung cows to butcher was Golgotha.  I thought everyone thought that.  I never played there.   A Jew would know what a "Hut" is,  and what is intended if he heard "Hut, Hut, Hut," which is what we heard walking the streets of our towns.   The bystanders never said anything,  or as much as raised an eyebrow.  "Let the Yids see to it," as they used to say in Germany.    We always understood what that meant,  and from the cradle understood that we were born to it.   It was our existence,  and people don't find it necessary to discuss their existence.    

3. I accuse the Government of allowing a murderous warrant to stand against me when it knows that the warrant was criminally originated when the hate criminals lied to the police (by withholding the fact that there were two of us–untangling a shed from trees I planted 25 years ago on a property line which the city sold and the Government taxed me on for 25 years without anyone knowing that the trees and shed were on the property line.   This is legal depravity that would make Eichman, Himmler and  Hilter blush).   Be that as it may,  the hate criminals called my helper before they called the police to conspire a plot where only the Hutterite would be targeted.    When the Police/State Attorney/Judge found out they had been lied to,  they went into coverup mode,  and, instead of re-investigating and exposing their rich patrons of committing a federal crime,  decided to get the case off the books by ramming the trial to a close before it draws the attention of the Federal Government.   I went public in the interests of safety (I would be grateful if you would pass this link to out of state friends as we have no Press here),  and to show the American people how,  as the New York Times recently wrote,  Government officials destroy people's lives by lying, fabricating, and gerrymandering evidence.   Add "murdering" to that,  because innocent people are killed around these murderous warrants.    Here the Government is charging me for a crime while hiding from the American people that they are only interested in charging a Hutterite,  for they know that everything on the Warrant pertains to two people.   They do not deny that there were two of us, they simply claim to have no knowledge that there were two of us,  because only a Hutterite reported that there were two of us.   But why would the Government not want the mountain of evidence that my helper could provide?   As you can see,  he's not even on the Government's witness list.    But wouldn't the Government want to know all there is about the crime that they have now spent thousands of dollars on?   Here they have someone who could tell them everything, because he was with me throughout.   They wouldn't even have to investigate.    Just make a phone call.  Why would he lie?   He was only doing what he does everyday,  helping his neighbor.    He  would not have come within ten miles if he thought we were doing anything  but moving a shed.   And that's all we did.   But the minute the Government admits that he was me throughout,  it is forced to ask:  "But why did the accusers withhold from the police that there were two of us.   Why would they call him before they sicced the police on me?"  Why?  Because this was never meant to be more than just another round of  Hut-baiting.    But do you even see his name on the Government witnesses.   I tell the Government,  "I can give you a witness who saw everything because he was there throughout."   In the interests transparency,  thoroughness,  fairness,  justice--why is the Government suppressing this information?    Because at  this point they would have to issue another Warrant,  and they know that if they tried to charge a non-Hutterite with such legal depravity,  the people would rise up.   They also know that to even admit that there were two of us would expose the hate-criminals of lying to the police.   Because the minute they admit that I had a helper they expose the whole ordeal as a Federal hate crime committed by one of their own.   But now,  the Government itself,  by refusing to reexamine the whole case with all the evidence, is participating in a historic hate crime.  They're not prosecuting crime here,  they're (as even the Sheriff says) processing hate,  and,  ultimately,  persecuting a Hutterite.   

4. I accuse the Government of extortion.   To get me to come to terms they threatened me (see Warrant)  with financial ruin by upping the damages to $100,000 (for untangling sheds from shrubs that I planted 25 years ago).   Fair enough.   “$100,000 divided by two,”  I tell the Sheriff,  “is $50,000 plus $50,000.   Why are you demanding both halves from the Hutterite.”  And here is where I see real fear in the Sheriff,  for  now he senses real danger.   He knows he’s playing with fire here, but he must have gotten assurance from his superiors that they can make all this go away.  Because it is now too late to backtrack.  He can refuse to investigate because, he tells me,  "only you keep reporting a second Vandal.   The hate criminals only reported you."    “Why only me,”   I ask.  “Because he hates you,”  he shot back.  He wants nothing to do with this because he knows it has nothing to do with crime.   If the hate criminals were respectable people reporting vandalism they would have reported all the Vandals.   Instead they called Vandal II to conspire against Vandal I and only then called the police to report the Hutterite. The Sheriff looked at the charges,  threw them back in disgust and basically said,  “Looks like you got caught in the machinery (see New York Times “Destroying Lives” above).    And a Hutterite has no rights which any one is bound to respect.   “But,”  I ask,   “don’t I have a right not to pay both halves if I only committed half the crime?  How are you not guilty of extortion here?”   Does not even a Hutterite have the right not to be robbed of $50,000 if there were two bank robbers.  Is it fair to make me pay both halves?   "Two participants,  two Warrants,"  Judge Garland would say.  "$100,000 divided by two comes to $50,000 each."   But by shielding the hate criminals,  the Court is forced to demand the entire $100,000 from me.   "If an innocent American citizen is being extorted to pay $50,000,   doesn't the Constitution require you to investigate?"  I ask the Sheriff.   Because all he would have to do is make one phone call to prove that  justice requires,  as Judge Garland would say,  "Two Warrants,  and $50,000 each."    But that would expose the hate criminals of Hut-baiting.    “You need a lawyer,"  he shouts and runs back into his office.   This would make Heydrich, Himmler, and Hitler blush.  

--------------------------------

BROOKINGS SD POLICE/ATTORNEY GENERAL/JUDGE COVERING UP HATE CRIME WITH SHAM TRIAL:  Two known participants,  only one investigated,  only one facing $100,000 charge,  Judge refuses to re-investigate in order to shield two richest people in county in Hate Crime:  They got caught throwing Mordecai the Jew Down the Well one more time,  and Police/State Attorney/Judge cannot bring themselves to make two of their own suffer the consequences  of what they consider a harmless past-time that now threatens to bring the whole house down.   They know they have a botched Hate Crime on their hands and refuse to re-investigate.   They are not prosecuting crime here,  they're (as the Sheriff himself says, below) processing Hate.

Cuius Regio, Eius Religio: Judicial Determinism:  The Danger of an Entrenched One-Party Judiciary:    South Dakota  Judiciary  Left to  Deal  with  Botched  Hate  Crime  Cover-up   see here

The coming nightmare of non-plural,  outcome-based Justice Systems.  I was framed by the State Attorney,  George Floyded by the Police,  and railroaded by the Judge.   Whether Red or Blue,  if you don't have patronage,  you'll be processed by prearranged, strongmanned, regional Justice,  and no one will  hear you.   The days when a poor shepherd could show up in Court with nothing more than the Truth and his Constitutional Voucher (unshredded by lawyers, loopholes  and lobbyists) are gone:  Constitutional Rights Reconstituted as Judicial Fatwas.  Here is the story.  

In a Nutshell:

1.  Unequal Justice--two  known participants  in same activity/deed--only one targeted by Police with up to $100,000 damages.  Police/State Attorney/Judge know they were led down a rabbit hole of Hate Crime and refuse to re-investigate.   They are now engaging in the same crime by denying that there were two of us.  This is my 14th Amendment voucher which Judge Garland asks me to redeem in Court and which the Judge refuses to address.  They have another warrant out for my arrest for boycotting this farce of a trial.   I will go sit in jail until the Government tells me what my 14 Amendment voucher means in the plain language in which it was written without being rotted away by lawyers, loopholes,  and lobbyists.   They all demand that I get a lawyer.   I insist on showing up with no more than plain speaking Truth and my plain 14th Amendment voucher.   The 14th Amendment says very plainly that if there were two of us,  you can't just prosecute one of us.  

2.  Extortion--Court  demands  entire  amount from me without  telling me if the $100,000 is my half or if it includes the half of the other participant.   If two bank robbers steal $100,000,  and the Judge demands the entire $100,000 from just one bank robber,  how is she not forcing one to pay for the crime of two:  extortion?  Imagine a judge threatening one American citizen with a $100,000 judgment while refusing to investigate his claim that there are two known participants.  This is a blatant crime against the 14th Amendment.   Which is why I am now banging on Judge Garland's door.   He tells me to redeem my Constitutional Rights in court.   I assume he means without them having been shredded by lawyers, loopholes,  and lobbyists.   When a judge simply ignores your claim that there were two of you,  the 14th Amendment is pure rubbish.   

3. Witness Hampering--I am asked to produce as my only  witness  who they know is  my accomplice--a mockery of the Fifth Amendment. 

4. Hate Crime--The Court is now forced to ask why ("he hates you,"  Sheriff says) the other participant was withheld from the Police.   They're not prosecuting crime,  but processing Hate.   Consequently,  I have asked the Supreme Court (SD) of Chief Justice Steven R. Jensen to consider the Hate Crime of Gerald Jensen and his accomplice Alice Intermill.   I'm awaiting a response.    

 
Again:   

A.  The  Brookings S.D.  Police /State  Attorney/Judge cannot admit that I had an accomplice (in good works--what a crime!) without exposing the two  richest people in the county of misleading the police in order to engage in a botched Hate Crime:  throwing shepherd Mordecai the Jew down the well one more time.   How did I know the Police were coming only after me?   Because my accomplice called to tell me.  How did he know?   Because the hate-criminals called him to conspire on how only I could be targeted.  I tell the Sheriff,  "I can you give you another just like me,  my accomplice."   He doesn't want another criminal just like me because his rich paymasters have all the criminals they want in Mordecai the Jew.   This the Judge has known for months.   The entire Judiciary of South Dakota has known this for weeks.   Yet they allowed the Trial to go forward,  knowing that it is in direct conflict with the 5th Amendment, as they are now forcing me to produce,  as my only witness,  my accomplice (taking the Fifth) who would now be forced to incriminate himself as my accomplice because of their violation of the 14 Amendment in holding only me accountable for the acts of two.   

B.  But now their denial of an accomplice forces them to seek the entire amount of compensation ($100,000 for thinning shrubs I planted 25 years ago) from only one of the participants,  making them guilty of  extortion.  The Judge played Russian Roulette with the 14 Amendment,   and ended up triggering a  chambered Extortion charge. When  you handle the  Truth,  assume that it's loaded.   Don't play with it,  and  don't abuse it as a  Stage-Prop.   "Your sin shall find you out....for  God is not mocked."    

If  you tell  a Judge that there were two of you  responsible for the same (non)crime over  and  over again,  and the Judge simply carries on  holding only you responsible,   the Constitution is of no use to you.   If a Judge can get away with this,  then no ordinary citizen can come even within a shadow of "having,"  as Judge Merrick Garland exhorts Americans,  "their Constitutional rights redeemed in Court."  I will go sit in jail until Judge Garland tells me how one person can be judged for the actions of two.   As Paul said,  "Let them come fetch us,  for they have beat us openly being Romans."     

        "HE HATES YOU,"  Sheriff of Brookings County,  SD of hate-criminals Gerald Jensen/Alice Intermill.

         "What do you want me to do?"   Judge Abigail Howard.  

1.  Stop!! "ghosting" my witness/accomplice.

2.  Stop!!  extorting me for both halves of the $100,000,  since there were two of us.

3.  Stop!! pretending that this is anything more than a botched hate crime,  that the stated crimes are not pure legal depravity.   There is no crime here.   None whatsoever.   But the Police,  the State Attorney,  and the Judge got caught covering up a botched Hate Crime when they "ghosted" my accomplice (guilty only of  helping his neighbor as usual--if such is a crime,  I hereby put the Government on notice that I intend to commit much more of the same in the future--I suppose the Government will  now George Floyd me again just for saying that) so they could target only me.   You couldn't make this up.   

WHY THE JUDGE ERASED ME AND GHOSTED MY ACCOMPLICE/WITNES

1. Because the Police know they have a botched hate crime on their hands here.  But now the Police are guilty of the Federal crime of extortion (look at the Warrant--$100,000--I planted those $100,000 mangled shrubs).

2. Because the State Attorney knows he has a botched hate crime on his hands here.  But now the State Attorney is guilty of the Federal crime of extortion (look at the Warrant--$100,000--I have have been thinning those $100,000 shrubs for 25 years).

3. Because Judge Abigail Howard knows she has a botched hate crime on her hands here.  But now the Judge is guilty of the Federal crime of extortion (look at the Warrant--$100,000--divided by 2 is $50,000+$50,000=$50,000 extortion).

AGAINST THE PILLARS

JUDGE ABIGAIL HOWARD ACCUSED OF JUDICIAL  MISCONDUCT:   “I APPEAL UNTO CAESAR"

Judicial and Prosecutorial Misconduct.  State Attorney Dan Nelson and Judge Abigail Howard’s criminal violation of the 14 Amendment (“ghosting” my accomplice/witness) so complicated my defense and due process that it beggars description.   The enormity of their crimes against me left me no choice but to boycott my “hanging trial” for fear of being arrested for “contempt of court.”   It was either that or allow myself to be railroaded by a criminal farce of a trial,  because they destroyed my one and only witness when they “ghosted”  my accomplice by their treasonous assault on the 14th Amendment.   This is criminal.  Because I could not have begun to defend myself without saying what they would have deemed perjury:  that there is a Second Vandal who the Government denies exists.  In the interest of my personal safety I did not trust them not to arrest me for  what would have had to be said to avoid being railroaded in this criminal farce of a Court.  In short,  the demeanor of the police,  the State Attorney, and Judge left me so terrified that their criminal erasure of my person for months on end can not be seen as  anything but police-State intimidation.   In Brief after Brief,  I have brought this (Government “ghosting” of my witness) to the attention of the Court of Judge Howard only to be summarily ignored.  As I wrote in Brief 2,  “I have less standing under the Constitution than a slave before the Civil War as they at least had standing as property.” From Sheriff,  to State Attorney,  to Judge,  they have simply erased me.   I saw no purpose in showing up for a criminal farce where I had less standing than a slave.  I have appealed their crimes “unto Caesar.”   To allow such persons to administer the claims of Justice is like calling on Cain to do an autopsy on Abel.   For the Court to cast a blind eye on the criminal transgressions of the police and State Attorney is unconscionable.  Yet for months now I have confronted nothing but a wall of silence from this Court.   For now,  after depriving me of a Trial by Jury, the inaction of this Court robbed me of my one and only witness.   They demanded that I appear in Court without my witness.   This I was unwilling to do because The Second Vandal (whom the Government keeps hidden) would have consumed all the oxygen in the courtroom as the Government “ghosted” elephant in the room.   My shadowboxing in the shade of this elephant likely would have resulted in a charge of both perjury and contempt of Court.  So it was either submit silently while they rain their lies down upon me (although they had the judge shred the most blatant ones out of their legal depravity when they saw me closing in on them),  chance being George Floyded again,  or boycott in protest.   Without my witness this was no more than a public hanging (as I predicted earlier).   This judge has not listened to one word I have said so far.   Because she pretends that the hate criminals Gerald Jensen and Alice Intermill are no more than upstanding citizens reporting a crime,  when they engaged in a hate crime by reporting a falsehood, and withheld from the police that I had an accomplice who is my only witness,  whom she refuses  to acknowledge.     Because to acknowledge my witness would be to expose her rich patrons as hate criminals.  This is the crime  that cries to high heaven here,  the last act of an eight year old campaign of using the police and law to terrorize me.   A new judge will have to clarify the following areas of conflict created by the Government’s violation of the 14 Amendment (“ghosting”  my accomplice) to make way for a fair trial and due process.    

 Catch-22 I--My only witness is my (“ghosted”) accomplice whom the Fifth Amendment forbids me to compel to incriminate himself as my accomplice.  He cannot be forced to incriminate himself,  and his pleading the Fifth leaves me without a witness.

Catch-22 II-- Because the State Attorney and Court cannot acknowledge the existence of my accomplice without incriminating themselves in the cover-up of the hate crime of false accusers Gerald Jensen/Alice Intermill,  their criminal violation of the 14th Amendment now creates a conflict in the Fifth,  in that,  having “ghosted” my one and only witness,  they have weaponized the Fifth Amendment to deprive me of my one and only witness,  who would materialize as my accomplice the minute he testifies.   As long as the State wants him not to be my accomplice,  why would he make himself one?   To be forced to show up in Court,  having had my witness destroyed,  is criminal.  But to insist that I have a Witness, when the State  denies that I have one,  would subject me to the charge of perjury.  I was too terrified to attend this criminal farce.   

Catch-22 III--Consequently,  I am condemned either to silence in court (lest I am charged with perjuring myself by claiming to have a witness who the State denies exists),  or,  I  am blackmailed into lying that I do not have a witness (lest I be charged with perjury for telling the truth),  and thus conceding the false charges against me.   “I have appealed unto Caesar” to remove me from such judicial hucksterism.   

To allow such compromised persons to preside over the claims of Justice is like calling on Cain to perform an autopsy on Abel.   And I have heard nothing but silence from the Court, month after month.  I have worn myself out running from Court, to State Attorney,  to Sheriff, back to Court, to State Attorney, to Sheriff--trying to get them to acknowledge my witness,  because as long as they keep “ghosting” my accomplice,  I am denied my witness.   The fact that they feel compelled to “ghost” my witness tells you they are engaging in criminal legal mischief.   In the interests of safety (for I was tortured until I “cooperated” and almost George Floyd murdered by this criminal Warrant),  I have deemed it necessary to put all this out on the world-wide web for all the world to see.  For  I am in the unenviable  position of being both the victim of a slanderous hate crime,  and whistle-blower to expose the unbelievable corruption within the South Dakota  System of Justice (an entrenched la familia Magafia)--as if the country (l’ affaire ill-starred Attorney General Ravnsborg) needed a reminder. 

Briefly then:  For nine months now I have been hammering the one point that explodes this Warrant into a hate crime:  the existence of the Second (Government-ghosted) Vandal,  my accomplice,   to whom pertain all aspects of this Warrant.   The State Attorney’s intentional denial of a Second Vandal is simultaneously a denial that I had an accomplice,  who is my only witness,  who subsequently cannot be my witness without incriminating himself as my accomplice,  which consequently destroys my defense.   This is the first Catch-22.   But now a second one emerges:  the State Attorney cannot admit to a Second Vandal without incriminating himself as abetting a hate crime,  violating the 14th Amendment,   extorting Vandal One for the crimes of Vandal Two,  covering up a hate crime,  and allowing a lethal police Warrant to hold sway over an innocent American when he knew it was criminally originated.   The same can now be said of the Court of Judge Abigail Howard.   To allow such compromised persons to administer the claims of Justice is like calling on Cain to perform an autopsy on Abel.   They’re not prosecuting crime,  they’re processing hate.   Because,  if there is a Second Vandal to whom pertain all the aspects of this Warrant,  then the State Attorney and the Court of Judge Abigail Howard are guilty of

1.  Covering up Obstruction of Justice.  They keep hiding the fact that false accusers Gerald Jensen and Alice Intermill intentionally withheld from the police that there was a Second Vandal to whom pertain all aspects of the Warrant.  Which is why they cannot reveal my accomplice,  who is my only witness,  who cannot bear witness without incriminating himself as my accomplice, and in turn,  incriminating the State Attorney and this Court in all the crimes enumerated here.   My earlier Briefs to the Court make very clear that I had an accomplice,  the elephant in the room of which I have been reminding the Court for months now.  The silence from the Court constitutes a denial of my right to due process,  as I cannot proceed without a witness,  whom to as much as mention in Court is to subject me to the charge of perjury as the Government denies that my accomplice, who is my only witness,  exists.    This elephant in the room is my witness whom the State Attorney and Court must keep hidden in order not to incriminate themselves as abetting a hate crime.  Because,  the fact that the accusers called the Second Vandal who then called me to let me know that only I was to be targeted reveals the nature of the Warrant as a hate crime (“why not report the Second Vandal,”  I asked the Sheriff.  “Because he hates YOU,”  says the Sheriff).    But the unreported Vandal cannot be reported later (now) without revealing a hate crime.  Because if you call the police to report a bank robbery,  why would you withhold from the police that there were two and not one bank robbers,  if you knew there were two bank robbers?  I asked the Sheriff that:   “Because he hates YOU,”  he says.   Any five year old could see that.   The State Attorney knows he’s sitting on a hate crime, which is why he keeps hiding from the Court that he knows that there is a Second Vandal.   He cannot reveal the Second Vandal without incriminating himself.  The Second Vandal was not reported.   Why?   “Because he (Jensen/Intermill) hates YOU,”  says the Sheriff.   In other words,  the State Attorney and Court are not prosecuting crime here,  but processing hate.   To allow such persons to preside over the claims of Justice is like calling on Cain to perform an autopsy on Abel.   But,  in covering up a hate crime,  the State Attorney and Court have also destroyed my only witness, because the hidden Second Vandal is my accomplice,  and an accomplice cannot be forced to bear witness against himself,  as he would have to, since all aspects of the warrant pertain to both of us.     I asked the Sheriff why he didn’t give him a plea bargain to get him to testify against me.  That would at least open the door to allowing him as my witness.  But the Sheriff knows that even that door is closed.   Because,  as he keeps telling me,  “The owners did not report a Second Vandal,  and only you keep reporting a second Vandal.”  When I ask him why the owners did not report the Second Vandal he says,  “Because he hates YOU,”  landing us right back where we started.   Because they cannot now acknowledge the Second Vandal without revealing a hate crime.  Which is why I was to  to be processed without the due process of my witness.    This is a criminal farce.  They are not prosecuting crime here.  They’re processing hate under the pretext of upholding the Constitution.   The Sheriff has no interest in another $100,000 Vandal,  and destroyer of property.   The State Attorney has no interest in another $100,000 Vandal,  and destroyer of property.   The Court has no interest in another $100,000 Vandal and destroyer of property.  But that $100,000 Vandal and destroyer of property is my only witness,  whose existence the Government is now suppressing.   By denying the existence of my accomplice,  they have weaponized  the Fifth Amendment against me by rendering him ineffective as a witness.   Because an accomplice cannot be forced to incriminate himself.   As long as he remains “ghosted”  by the Government he remains innocent,  so why would he incriminate himself when the Government denies that he exists?   And of course the Court could not compel the Second Vandal to testify even if I produced him.   And neither the Sheriff nor the State Attorney nor the Court want him to confess to the enormous crimes attributed to me (even with the lies now shredded out of this legal depravity).  In fact,  they have taken the greatest pains not to know,  as they have all the crime they need in the First Vandal.  With such ironclad immunity,  why would Second Vandal testify?   Because, according to the Government,  he doesn’t exist.   Which leaves me without my one and only witness.   Which raises the prospect of a perverse Catch-22:   If I now claim to have a witness,  when the Government denies the existence of such,  how am I not then guilty of lying in Court under penalty of law?   But if I falsely state (to avoid the charge of perjury) that I do not have a witness (on whom my defense rests) then I concede the false evidence against me.   This legal depravity has thus spawned three Catch-22's,  and who knows what other monsters lie quaking in the mud waiting to be hatched here.   The Government  needs to tell me,  having commanded me to bring my witnesses,  how I am to force my witness,  who was my accomplice,  to incriminate himself as such by volunteering to be my witness.   I consulted the finest legal minds and find the authorities (save for an obscure gloss in Grotius, widely disputed not to be by the hand of the Master himself) greatly conflicted here,  with most of the more venerable sages falling almost equally between two stools.   In the end,  I found myself none the wiser for these pedants.

2.  Violating the 14 Amendment of Equal Justice under the law.    Both the police and the State Attorney have known since June 29, 2021 that there is a Second Vandal on the loose out there to whom pertain all aspects of the Warrant.  The Court has known since Briefs 1 and 2 (above).   “Who is it?”  the Sheriff keeps asking,  before hitting the delete button again.  “You need a lawyer,”  he keeps shouting at me.    “Sort it all out at the trial,”  he tells me.   "But why is the Government not interested in a $100,000 Second Vandal,”  I ask.   “You need a lawyer,”  he says.   But for the grace of God,  I would need a shrink,  as I whiplash from “who is it,”  to “you need a lawyer,”  to “sort it out at the trail.”  This is the police,  prosecutorial,  and judicial depravity the Government is engaged in here at the behest of its rich patrons:   Rich man’s militia,  poor man’s terror.   Shouldn’t he at least arrest me for reporting false crimes?    But he knows full well where the crime is here,  which is why he runs from me.   Because he,   the State Attorney,  and the Court know they’re sitting on a 14th Amendment powderkeg.   False accusers Jensen/Intermill sheriff-whispered them down a rabbit hole of obstruction of justice,  and they want this off the books before the Federal Government steps in.   They needed to ramrod this through and get it over with.   But their criminal violation of the 14th Amendment destroys my defense by depriving me of my one and only witness.   Because,  they want to know nothing about an accomplice,  and he’s not about to become one by becoming my witness.   “Who is it,”  the Sheriff keeps asking.   “Who,” I reply,  “my accomplice, my witness,  or the $100,000 Second Vandal whom you have disappeared, or all three.”   “At the trial,”  he says,  “all will be sorted out.”    What began as a criminal fraud (the Warrant)  has now degenerated into a criminal farce (the Trial).   I could not participate in this criminal farce.   I would have had to remain completely silent while they rained their lies down upon me to avoid being charged with perjury and contempt of court.   They would have put me in handcuffs again,  and the thought of being George Floyded again gave me pause.    

3.  Extortion--I am made to pay my share, and the share of my accomplice,  all $100,000.   This automatically follows if I had an accomplice.  Which is why they must hide my accomplice who is my only witness.   But now the Government is guilty of extortion.   I asked the Sheriff,  “How are you and the State Attorney (and now the Court) not guilty of extortion if you force me to pay for a crime done by two people?”  “You need a lawyer,”  he keeps shouting.   Why doesn't he just say,  “There is no second Vandal,”  and arrest me for making a false accusation?     Because,  if there is no Second Vandal to whom pertain all aspects of the Warrant,  then I’m accusing both the Sheriff,  State Attorney and the Court falsely when I accuse them of all the crimes enumerated here.   But,  as the Sheriff keeps telling me,  “The owners did not report the Second Vandal,  and only you keep reporting the Second Vandal,”   even as the whole neighborhood knows there is a Second Vandal,  an accomplice in the enormous crimes I am charged with (legal depravity larded with falsehoods now shredded out).   “Who is it,”  he keeps asking,  and when I tell him he says,  “Oh…,”  before hitting the delete button again,  because the “Who is it” is my one and only witness whom the Government “ghosted.”   “You need a lawyer,”  he says.  “But why do I need more than the truth?”  I ask.   Judge Garland tells Americans to redeem their Constitutional vouchers in Federal Court.   I thank him.  Here I come to Federal Court,  because my Constitutional voucher has proved absolutely worthless in State Court.   When would simply telling the truth not be enough to redeem a Constitutional right?   When the Government frames you by shielding your accomplice.  This is why the Sheriff tells me I need a lawyer.  “All I need,”  I tell him,  “is for you to do your job.”   You need a raft of lawyers when State  Attorneys frame you by “ghosting”  your accomplice.   I sense deep-seated,  primordial fear in the Sheriff everytime I approach him.  Because he sees the spectre of the “ghosted”  Vandal looming behind me,  and behind him the ominous shadow of an approaching Federal Prosecutor.   And the State Attorneys keep hiding behind their secretaries.    But as they cannot reveal the Second Vandal without creating a political scandal that will reverberate across the entire country,  they are forced to suppress my witness.   Meanwhile,  I’m to be processed without the due process of my witness.   How was  I not to think that having been framed in a fraudulent Warrant,  I am now being railroaded by a farcical trial?   For,  if the Second Vandal exists,  the Warrant is a fraud and a crime, and the trial is a farce and a crime.   But if the Second Vandal does not exist,  then why am I not accused of making false statements to the Sheriff,  the State Attorney and the Court?   Because the State Attorney knows the Second Vandal exists,  and the Sheriff knows the Second Vandal exists,  and the Court knows the Second Vandal exists,  because the whole neighborhood knows the Second Vandal exists.   But revealing the Second Vandal would create a political scandal that would reverberate across the country.  which is why I was to be processed without due process.  For concealing the Second Vandal conceals a multitude of crimes.   Which is why the Government is “ghosting” my witness by placing him in the Witness Non-Detection Program.   How am I not to think that having been framed by false evidence,  I would not now be railroaded in Court by this criminal coverup?  As you can tell from my earlier comments,  I was too terrified to say anything in Court and deemed it necessary to boycott this criminal trial altogether.   “I have appealed unto Caesar.”  I will force their hand.  I will now “bow myself against the pillars.”   

4.  Hampering a Witness--Their crime against the 14 Amendment now forces them to crash headlong into the Fifth in that they have “ghosted” my only witness who is my accomplice.  And they cannot acknowledge my accomplice without bringing a raft of Constitutional violations down upon their head.   Which means the Second Vandal cannot be investigated,  and because he knows this,  why would he incriminate himself by bearing witness?   Which means the Government has destroyed my witness.   This is the enormous crime of this monstrous trial.   

5.  Abetting a hate crime.  Admitting to a Second Vandal automatically reveals the motive of false accusers Jensen/Intermill,  not to report crime, but to use the police and law to destroy an innocent American citizen.   “Why only me?”  I ask the Sheriff.  “Because he hates YOU,”  he said.   Which is why the Government needs to keep the Second Vandal,  who is my only witness,  hidden.   

6.  Endangering the life of an innocent American by allowing a lethal police Warrant to stand when they had knowledge that it was criminally derived.   For I was

7.  Tortured until I “cooperated” and almost George Floyd murdered by this  criminal Warrant.    If the CIA did to a foreign terrorist in a foreign country what the police did to me in front of my bank in broad daylight in front of a crowd,  the country would be in an uproar,  the UN would scream “barbaric America” nonstop, and Congress would demand hearings.   “What do you want me to do?”  the judge asked dismissively.   Because as they say in certain parts of the country,  “George Floyd only got what George Floyd deserved.”   

My appeal is the result of having repeatedly brought these concerns before this Court only to be met with a criminal wall of silence.   My Constitutional right to due process cannot be met in this compromised jurisdiction.  This Court has demonstrated the most extreme bad faith and the presumption of guilt by utterly disregarding anything I say:  there is no accomplice,  no obstruction of justice,  no hate crime,   no torture,  no erasure of my only witness, no cover-up,  no extortion,   etc.   But if The Second Vandal exists then the Warrant is a criminal fraud and this Trial a monstrous crime.   But my entire defense rests on the existence of The Second Vandal,  whom the Court is unwilling to acknowledge.    For acknowledging the Second Vandal automatically turns the Warrant and the Trial into a Hate Crime.   

In Sum,  inasmuch as this Court refuses to acknowledge the existence of my accomplice,  it has itself become the last act of a hate crime eight years in the making,  and stands implicated in all the crimes enumerated above.

----------------------

10-16-21

Briefly:  The two richest people in Brookings County,   Gerald Jensen and his partner Alice Intermill engaged in a hate crime with an all too willing State Attorney.   But this time they got caught and now the State Attorney is covering up for them by hiding from the Judge that the hate criminals misled the police by intentionally withholding the fact that I had an accomplice to whom pertain all aspects of the Warrant.   But in doing so he committed the following Federal Crimes:

1.  Violating the 14 Amendment of Equal Justice under law (only one arrested, only because, as the Sheriff says, "He hates YOU") which now implicates him in

2.  Covering up Obstruction of Justice because he has known since June 29 that there is a Second Vandal.

3.   Extortion--I am made to pay my share, and the share of my accomplice,  all $100,000.  

4.   Witness Hampering-- In weaponizing the Fifth Amendment against me his criminal act now renders my accomplice ineffective as my witness,  as my witness can simply plead the Fifth Amendment to avoid incriminating himself.  

5.   Abetting a hate crime--the motive of the accusers Jensen/Intermill is revealed in their intentional withholding of crucial evidence from the Police.   Knowing this,  the State Attorneys are withholding this information from the Court.  The Sheriff reveals the only crime here:  "He hates you,"  he says.   The Warrant is no more than the weaponization of the Police and Law to engage in an exercise of hate.   The Government is not prosecuting crime here,  but processing hate,  allowing the Constitution to be used as a weapon by the rich to destroy the poor.  

6.   Endangering the live of an innocent American by allowing a lethal police Warrant to stand when he had knowledge that it was criminally derived.

10-16-21

CATCH--22:  STATE ATTORNEY ACCUSED OF WITNESS HAMPERING,  GRAND EXTORTION,  HATE CRIME COVER-UP

Summary:  The Judge asks me to bring my only witness,  who is my accomplice (this was intentionally withheld from the police),  who the Government says doesn't exist (everyone knows who it is),   who thus decides to take the Fifth,  whom I would now be forced to arrest and compel to incriminate himself---leaving me without a witness, which is why the Sheriff keeps shouting,   "you need a lawyer."    Because the judge commands me to produce this witness who stands on the 5th.   What am I,   a conjurer that I can just pull witnesses out of a hat on the day of the trial?   The Judge knows The Witness is my accomplice,  who stands Government-invisibled on the Fifth,  and thus cannot be my witness.   Yet she  tells me to bring my witness.   What am I supposed to do,  kidnap him?   How am I now not compelled to lie in Court when I insist that I have a witness who is my accomplice whom the Government has simply deleted?   If I produced him,  by what means could he be compelled to testify without turning himself into my accomplice,  who the Government says doesn't exist?   So here I am without a witness who could tell them everything they need to know because he was with me throughout.   What am I to do if the Sheriff,  the State Attorney,  and the Judge (and now the entire judiciary of South Dakota) know of this Catch-22 and all hold their breath until they get this nightmare off the books?   One Reddit reader feared a visit from the FBI just for linking to this site--it is considered so explosive.   Here the Sheriff and the State Attorney run from me.   The Judge looks at me and says,  "What do you want me to do?"   Well,  (as the Reddit reader implies)  they could at least arrest me for saying such things.   But I can see fear in the Sheriff every time I approach him.   I sought the Law and the Law run.   I am simply ignored.   "Aren't you and the State Attorney guilty of Grand Extortion here,"  I asked.   The Reddit reader assumes I'm making all this up--because even to confront a Sheriff with such a question sounds criminal.   The Sheriff turned and very quickly fled back into his office.   And I asked the question very quietly.   The Reddit reader fears a visit from the FBI,  and I can see fear in the Sheriff every time I approach him.   I wouldn't feel more toxic if I had a nuclear device strapped around my neck.   Why is the entire Government running from me?   

“Why are you not interested in the second bank robber (my Government-invisibled accomplice)?”  I asked the Sheriff.

“Because the owners (hate criminals Gerald Jensen/Alice Intermill) only reported you,  and you’re the only one reporting a second bank robber (or another $100,000 Vandal,  my accomplice),”  the Sheriff said.

“Why only me,”  I ask.  

“Because he hates YOU,”  the Sheriff said.  

“But shouldn’t the government be interested in an uninvestigated (my accomplice) $100,000 Vandal”?  I ask.   

“You need a lawyer,”  the Sheriff cried.

“The Government now has me on the hook for the entire $100,000.”   I said.   “How are you and the State Attorney not guilty of Grand Extortion here?”

“You need a lawyer,”  the Sheriff shouts,  when asked how a person can be both (the most infamous Catch-22 you ever heard of)  the second bank robber (my accomplice) and my only witness (the same accomplice)--whom the Government has now invisibiled.   

“All I need is for you to do your job,”  I said.   

“They’ll sort it all out at the trial,”  the Sheriff said hopefully,  fully aware that the muffled noise in the background is the grim footstep of an approaching Federal Prosecutor.   The State Attorneys got him into this,   and he can only hope they come up with a solution.   And he's telling me to get a lawyer.   

“No appointment dates available on State Attorneys’ calendar--forever” (secretaries).   

When I handed the Sheriff Brief 2 yesterday (10-12-21),  he seemed genuinely afraid (this time he came out of his office to meet me in the hall--thinking I would be easier to get rid of this way).  “Who’s your lawyer,”  he cried.   “I don’t have one,”  I said,  “why would I need a lawyer when I can just tell the truth.”  “You need a lawyer,”  he shouted.  “But why are you not interested in the second bank robber,” I asked.   “Because,”  he said,  “the owner did not report the second bank robber.  He reported only you,  and you’re the only one who keeps reporting the second bank robber.” That makes sense.   As Justice Taney sneered,  “An inferior Dred Scott has no rights which a ferior is bound to respect.”  If  DredScott reports a second bank robber,  the second bank robber need not exist if he must not exist,  and the State Attorney needs to keep the Second Bank Robber out of site in order to shield the true motives of his rich patrons,  the hate criminals Gerald Jensen/Alice Intermill,  not to report a crime,   but to use the police and legal system to destroy an innocent poor shepherd:  Rich man’s militia,  poor man’s terror.   

But if the second bank robber doesn't exist then neither does my only witness.  And the Judge tells me to bring my witnesses.   But I only have one,  and they (wait for it) "vanished"  him.  Now what am I to do?    "Sort it out at the trial,"  the Sheriff keeps telling me.   That's the problem.   How am I to sort what is not there?   How am I to produce a witness who the Government insists does not exist?   "Who is he?"  the Sheriff keeps shouting at me.   "Who,"  I say,  "my accomplice,  my witness,  or the $100,000 Vandal who doesn't exist,  or all three?"    "You need a lawyer,"  he  keeps  shouting.   So I run from Court,  to State Attorney, and back to Sheriff.   And now the whole world is watching this.   You over there,  in Istanbul,  tell me how someone can be both my accomplice,  who is also my witness,  who doesn't even exist,  but whom the Judge tells me to bring.   No wonder the Sheriff keeps asking,  "Who is it?"  I feel for him.  He didn't sign up to watch the rich grind the faces of the poor in the dirt.   Whether he can ultimately pin this on the State Attorney remains to be seen,   although he seems to entertain the hope that they can ram this to a close before they lose control of it and it lands on the desk of a Federal Prosecutor.   

With all this going on,  I am too terrified to say anything in Court,   lest they arrest me for contempt,  and George Floyd me again.   Frankly,  I don't have a clue what they're trying to charge me with because I tell them I have been trespassing that truckpark for 25 years (along with the rest of the town),  and have been thinning those mangled shrubs that I planted for 25 years.   This is the essence of this criminally reckless and murderous Warrant which saw me tortured until I  "cooperated"  and nearly George Floyd murdered.   My whole life has been nonstop crime if this is crime.   And now that they had the Judge shred their lies out of their criminal legal depravity,  nothing is left but criminal, reckless, legal depravity which saw me almost George Floyd murdered.   But they keep dragging me into court to tell me to show up the Monday after that.   I feel as if I have been subjected (for 9 months now) to legal-be-back-here-next-Monday-to-be-told-to-be-here-next-Monday-or-I'll-send-the-Police-after-you-waterboarding (and I can tell you what waterboarding is, although no one ever mentioned a board and to this day I don't know what "board" means,  even though I can give you the animated version of  waterboarding--a child's mind makes hay with such things).   Never ending Purgatory.   My goal is thus to say nothing that will give them an excuse to arrest me again,  because I see this as no more than an extension of eight years of police terror,  and I do not think I would survive another George Floyding.    They have demonstrated the most extreme bad faith,  ill will,  the presumption of guilt and utter disregard of anything I say:  there is no accomplice,  no obstruction of justice,  no hate crime,   no torture,  no erasure of my only witness, no cover-up,  no extortion,   etc.   

I am being processed.  An utter mockery of due process.   Because nothing I say has any meaning whatsoever (I have less standing in Law than a slave before the Civil War--they were at least visible as property).  The fact that I do not mortgage my soul to hire one of these grovelers to sort out the Government's criminal incompetence and culpability is clear proof that I cannot be taken seriously.   Such is the legal rot that an honest man telling the truth in court is considered a freak--they all run from me as if I am a terrorist:  “away,  no, not a word more,  we have all we need to hang you.  Go away,  and say no more about a second bank robber.”   Why?   Because for the Government to now admit that the second bank robber exists is to admit that the hate criminals Gerald Jensen/Alice Intermill lied to the police in order to frame me.   Because,  before they called the police on me,  they called the second bank robber who then called me to let me know that they would report only me.   This is what the Government is now covering up.  This is why they need to get this trial over with before a Federal Prosecutor decides to call a Grand Jury.    

The Sheriff could hear the approaching steps of a Federal Prosecutor in my line of questioning,  but he’s hoping the State Attorney will provide him cover.   Which is why the second bank robber cannot be allowed to exist.   “But he’s my only witness,”  I said.   “Is the Government now telling me to compel my witness to incriminate himself,  because, as every aspect of the Warrant pertains to two people,  his testimony would at once make him a criminal.  But if I cannot compel him,  and if he stands on the 5th,  how can he be a witness?  And how has the State Attorney now not destroyed my defense by destroying my witness by his criminal violation of the 14th Amendment.”   “You need a lawyer,”  he said.    And to think all this is read in Istanbul (I lie awake at night trying to figure out who this is--but welcome--hello to my old friends in South Korea).   

The entire legal system is on the run here.   They all avoid me like the plague,  as if I had a ticking nuclear device strapped around my neck.  A $100,000 crime and I can’t give it away.   I could drag in ten dead bodies by the heel and they would all pretend they don’t exist.   The State Attorneys keep sending out a raft of secretaries to shoo me off to the police.  “But $100,000 is serious crime,”  I tell them.   “You go to the police if you have crime to report,”  they tell me coldly.   "Make an appointment,"  the Sheriff told me.   "You can do that?"  I asked,  kicking myself for not asking for one when I tried to get them to talk to me when I was there earlier.   That was it then.   If you need to speak with State Attorneys,  you need to make an appointment.   I thanked the Sheriff for his counsel,  and hurried back to make my appointment.   The secretary disappeared for a very long time.  Finally,  she emerged with a very unwelcome step to tell me the dreadful news:   "There are no appointments available."   "But I can come in anytime,  and I would only need ten minutes,"  I said.   "No,  no---just show up at your next court date."  "Let me at least leave you my number,"   I said.   You would have I thought I was handing her the Plague.    I waited and waited.   "Hello,  hello----,"---"If you need to make a call,  hang up and try again---if this is an emergency,   we are currently experiencing long delay time---goodbye.................."   But apparently people can make an appointment.   The Sheriff himself will tell you that.   "Ten minutes,  any time, day or night,"  I said.   I even left my number.   Because the can see the ominous shadow of the Second ($100,000) Vandal looming behind me.   This is the elephant in the room who makes the Sheriff cry out,  "Who is it?"  Because the "Who Is It" is The Non-Witness.  You could not make this up.   

Wearily,  I schlepp myself over to the High Sheriff--again.   “Who's your lawyer,”   he cries.  “Why do I need a lawyer, when I can just tell the truth,”  I ask.  “You need a lawyer,”  he shouts.   “Get it all sorted out at the trial,  and then we can talk about it.”   “The Trial” has now become the Grand Theory of Everything.   At “The Trial”  everything will be arranged.   But once they’ve got this off the books and out of the cross-hairs of a Federal Prosecutor we’ll be back to the usual  of “throw Mordecai the Jew down the well one more time.”   They never meant for it to go this far.  It never used to.  But now their sin has found them out.  This is what makes them angry,  and why they’re closing ranks to make the second bank robber invisibled (I’m having to invent new terms because I’m dredging the undersides of the legal sewers here).  Before,  they could always make this matter disappear,  rough up Mordecai the Jew without suffering consequences:   I can show you where the bodies are  (how is it that I can say that to a judge and prosecutor and not have them take me up on it--I know of few people who could get away with this?  For the same reason that I can give you a very animated version of waterboarding,  although we never called it waterboarding).   Remarkably,  the Government scrubbed my name from the lists of Alcatraz and Fort Leavenworth.   My pulse quickened as my eye scanned down to Winhoven.  I wondered what the number was beside my name and the crime in the box beside it,  surrounded by killers that made the leaders of the world wake up in cold sweat.   My name has been scrubbed.   In both lists.   No empty spaces either.  

I grew up in the shadow and terror of Alcatraz and Leavenworth.   I have known about the infamous “Hole” (the rats, the shivering,  the dripping, the gnawing hunger) where you were told “the last four we carried out,”  since I was child (imagine what a child's mind does with such things,  because I always imagined it all happened yesterday).    You’ll find my DNA down in there if you scrub hard enough.  Judge Merrick Garland has my name, just as it appears on the Warrant,  in his file, but they disappeared it from the list made available to the public.   Not even an empty space remains.   

The Police,  State Attorney, and the Court have rendered me invisible here,  because they cannot be caught on the record having me tell them that THERE. IS. A. SECOND. BANK. ROBBER.  Why?  Because THE SECOND BANK ROBBER immediately explodes the current Warrant and Trial into a Hate Crime masquerading as a criminal farce--a comedy of depravity--and the focus has to now shift to 

1.  Obstruction of Justice by hate criminals Gerald Jensen/Alice Intermill.

2.  Cover-up of Obstruction of Justice by the State Attorneys and Police.

3. Violation of the 14th Amendment of Equal Justice under the Law by the State Attorneys and Police.

4. Witness Hampering--destroying my defense by turning my witness into a 5th Amendment Catch-22.

5. Grand Extortion--making me liable for the full $100,000 when every aspect of the Warrant pertains to two people.

6. Criminal negligence and culpability by allowing a lethal Warrant to stand against an innocent citizen when they had abundant proof that the Warrant was recklessly and criminally generated.   

7. Police torture.  

This is why the Police cannot acknowledge The Second ($100,000) Vandal:  my Witness.

This is why the State Attorneys cannot acknowledge The Second ($100,000 ) Vandal:  my Witness.

This is why the Court cannot acknowledge The Second ($100,000) Vandal:  my Witness.

This is why The Second ($100,000) Vandal (my Witness)  has been erased by the Government.   

“Who is it,”  the Sheriff keeps asking--before hitting the “delete”  button again.   I mention him in the first paragraph the very day I received the Warrant 9 months ago.   I gave all that information to both the Sheriff and the State Attorney  on June 29, 2021,  the day they George Floyded me on Main street until I “cooperated”--that,  I told the judge,  is the CIA default definition of torture.   Summarily dismissed.   I have fewer rights in this jurisdiction than a terrorist in a foreign country.  Because,  if the CIA did to a foreign terrorist in a foreign country what the police did to me in front of my bank,   the country would be in an uproar,  the UN would scream “barbaric America” nonstop, and Congress would demand hearings.   Summarily dismissed.   The Government has essentially labeled me insane,  because nothing I say can possibly mean anything.   Eight years of the police acting as the rich man’s militia to terrorize me--could not have happened (don't destroy those cams,  I always tell them).   Second Bank Robber--doesn’t exist.   Subjected to torture--never happened.   Screamed in panic when stuffed in a stifling hot police cruiser--not credible.   Now why would any sane person assume that, having been framed by false evidence which the Police,  the State Attorney,   and the Court refuse to investigate,  I would now not be railroaded in Court?   Which is why I have asked the Federal Government to step in.   "I APPEAL UNTO CAESAR."

(to be continued)

9-24-21

AND NOW A HANGING JUDGE 

SOUTH DAKOTA STATE ATTORNEY DAN NELSON AND DEPUTY STATE ATTORNEY AUSTIN J. OXNER TO BE ACCUSED OF FEDERAL CRIME IN UPCOMING TRIAL:   CRIMINAL COVER-UP OF HATE CRIME IN CO-CONSPIRACY TO DESTROY AN AMERICAN CITIZEN BY GERALD JENSON AND HIS PARTNER ALICE INTERMILL 

This adulterer and his partner know now that they have been caught red-handed in their conspiracy to use the police and Courts to destroy me by feeding them information that they have now asked the Judge to destroy (and the judge is playing along--this is how things are done out here on the prairie).   Today (9/20/21) the State Attorneys (their willing enablers--Google the book.  I mean exactly that) had the judge make the Warrant the equivalent of a traffic ticket so they can deny me a jury trial (which had already been scheduled for Oct 1, but now hurriedly vacated (my hanging date is now Oct 21) because they saw I was closing in fast to put them all on the block.  I told the judge about the elephant in the room a month ago, the withheld evidence that will automatically make them (the State Attorneys) co-conspirators to destroy an American citizen--not that they vacated the trial, but when they dumped the false evidence against me, nothing is left now to warrant a Trial by Jury--and for this they assassinated my Christian testimony and almost had me George Floyd murdered--and wasted tens of thousands of tax payer money--I say nothing of the unspeakable terror they inflicted on the kindest and most respected man in the county who helped me and who stood to be implicated in their damnable falsehoods.  Here (also below) is the evidence these henchmen now admit is false, and have asked the judge to get rid off (shred)--the poor which I see shaken down every Monday by these very same henchmen are skinned alive in Court.  Here it's "er, judge, we, your State Attorneys heh, are about to get caught in a Federal Crime, heh,  helping the two richest people in the county destroy a squashed cabbage leaf of a poor shepherd--can you shred the evidence"--  for crime, heh, heh, "dismissed" (shredded, heh) is crime, heh,  not done, heh.  "Were we, heh, heh, not in sport, heh?"  As the heat intensifies and this will now escalate rapidly,  they and the accusers will simply call on the judge to drop charges and have the case dismissed altogether--this is how things are "taken care of" for the rich out here.   The Sheriff (an honest straight talking man) knows what this is ("he hates you," he said--I want to see the look on the judge's face when I repeat this in Court), and will have nothing to do with it--he knows they're all sitting on a powder keg and he's not about to join them there.  When I stepped into his office I thought I was back in the Wild West  trucking world 40 years ago, when these lawmen were part of the jungle, in the Truck Stops and during the night on the  CB--tough but they talk turkey.  "Tell me what this is,"  I said, handing him the Warrant.  He gave it a contemptuous look, threw it back and basically said "looks like you got caught in the machinery."  "Why?"  I asked.  "Because he hates you," he shot back.  We were back in the day when we were both much younger, when men spoke their minds, or, as he puts it, a man's handshake was his word, and in the moment he spoke with complete candor.  He did me a great favor there, and now, I'm afraid, I have done him a very bad one in mentioning it, but I never apologize for putting a feather in a man's cap, and he's the last of the old lawmen.  They should send him to Washington to be Judge Garland's (the last of the classical judges--an immense loss for the country that he's not on the Court) spokesman.  But here is the State admitting it almost murdered an American citizen on falsified information--and  they cannot stop the trial without opening a can of worms that could end up in the Halls of Congress, and they are now desperately trying to make this disappear without drawing the attention of the Federal Government.   The judge knows I'm trying to get this to a Federal jurisdiction, a Federal Prosecutor and a Federal Grand Jury,  but they can't allow this to get out of South Dakota.       (see doc here.

Here's the evidence that the State now admits was always false--they arrested and almost murdered me for driving through an industrial park which all the town does.  They now say that I did not refuse to leave the  property when asked (no one ever said anything to me), and did not "intentionally" cut my own shrubs.  Can you believe this?  The State is here admitting that the adulterer Gerald Jensen and his partner Alice Intermill lied to them, and the judge now knows that she wrote a murderous Warrant on false evidence (and yet still allows the Warrant's murderous potential to bear down on an innocent citizen--this itself is criminal).   The State Attorneys are shredding this evidence now, not because they did not know months ago that Jensen and Intermill lied to the police, but that I was about to examine them in Court,  and that the State Attorneys were  about to be exposed in a conspiracy to  destroy an innocent American through abuse of their office.  Which means the State Attorneys knew they were covering up a Federal Crime (if they were not co-conspirators from the beginning), and in doing so, committed a Federal Crime:

"Pursuant to SDCL 23A-44-2, Austin J. Oxner, Deputy States Attorney in and for Brookings County, South Dakota, dismisses the information for Entering or Refusing  to Leave Property After Notice and Intentional Damage to Property that was filed in this case."

No judge would have written a Warrant on what remains of the original charges, even if true.  None of it is.  I planted those trees long before the town, without ever telling anyone where the property line is,  sold the land on which they were.   To this day, none of the neighbors know where the property line is--nor even the Government, for they taxed me on these buildings which were on trespassed ground for 25 years.  In other words, the Government facilitated (and benefited from) a crime for which they now condemn me.  I have repeatedly told the judge to allow me to present evidence of false evidence and obstruction of justice, only to be summarily dismissed.  But why would the State Attorneys ask here to shred evidence?  Because they know it's false.   Why don't they go after the false accusers?  For the same reason they will not admit that there were two of us (this is the elephant in the room--a crime against the 14th Amendment).  It would expose the criminal motive of the accusers, not to report a crime, but to use the law to conspire against an American citizen.   So it cannot come up in Court.  The State Attorneys are covering up a Federal Crime,  which is why they told the judge not to  allow the evidence against me in Court.  It exposes the criminal intent of the accusers whom they are now shielding, and they know I will turn it against all of them, including the State Attorneys.   A fool could see what's going on here.  The State Attorneys are covering their tracks.  The judge has enough evidence now to remove me from the lethal jeopardy of this criminally originated Warrant--yet she allows it to expose an innocent American to danger, to continue to be slandered.  They all want to get this over with so they can move on.  But the elephant is still in the room (the hidden second bank robber)--this is the Government's terrible secret.   The High Sheriff knows everything but refuses to get involved (he knows what this is),  all the State Attorneys run from me and steadfastly refuse to even let me make an appointment (they send out their secretaries to shoo me off, hiding behind women's skirts--I told the judge this in court--I sought the law and the law run), and now the judge pats me on the head and tells me to just be a good little boy and not make any trouble, for what could a squashed cabbage leaf of a shepherd know?  You couldn't make this up.  And now they decided  they can't let me share this with a jury, so they dumped all the false evidence, and the judge will hold a little trial with no one around--just like the KGB used to do.   I would have better odds in Pyongyang, or Kabul, or Istanbul.     “Do not be afraid. Stand still, and see the salvation of the LORD."

Now read all the Warrants here and see what's left of the Warrant that almost got me murdered.  
1.  They now admit they lied to convince the judge to write the Warrant.  And yet the judge is now playing along hoping I'm too stupid to know what's going on here, and in so doing allows this criminal Warrant to impose its lethal influence on my life, and the slander which the Warrant occasioned.  This is criminal.  

2.   The judge now has concrete evidence of what I informed her off a month ago:  that the Warrant is entirely criminal.  She now has confirmation that she was lied to and was made to issue a murderous Warrant on false information utterly fabricated.  This reckless and frivolous Warrant would never have seen the light of day without the false evidence they are now trying to dump into the river.  

3.  The judge now has concrete evidence that the State Attorneys are engaged in a cover-up, shielding the accusers, and tampering with evidence.  In essence, criminal obstruction of justice.  

They asked the judge not to allow the original evidence--imagine that, they almost murdered an innocent citizen and now ask the judge to get rid of the false evidence they used to hunt me like a murderer--I saw it only when I got home on the back of the paperwork.  The judge should have brought this to my attention--this is getting shadier by the day, and the judge is left to do damage control to keep the State from getting saddled with the enormous criminal depravity of rouge State Attorneys--on which the Warrant is based, the result being that I cannot now examine it in court--they know the accusers lied,  which means the State Attorneys are now covering up for them.   It incriminates the false witnesses as lying under oath, and the State Attorneys are desperately trying to shield them (and themselves) by making their falsehoods disappear (you couldn't make this up--this is the MAGAFIA--they wouldn't recognize the Constitution from My Kampf out here).   With the charges diminished the law no longer allows them to  jail me.   You would have thought they were handing me a billion dollars, beaming at me long and silently to let me savor the moment.   "Put the charges back," I told them bluntly.  "I want my jury back."  But the charges are now so trivial that I now no longer qualify for a jury trial (this is what they now desperately seek to avoid), and since they now asked the judge to shred the original evidence (which they know to be false), I can no longer examine it in order to expose it as obstruction of justice and misleading the police.  They would like the trial to disappear altogether, but that would expose the Warrant as utterly criminally reckless and frivolous from the beginning.   So they told the judge to not allow me to examine the evidence on which they almost had me George Floyd murdered--and the Judge snuck it into the paperwork without telling me--I almost swallowed my eye teeth at this latest piece of effrontery when I noticed it.  To sell me on this latest dose of court bile the judge looked at me with beaming eye (now I was really suspicious, because up to now it was always, "did you hear that, you squashed cabbage leaf of a shepherd, you better be here on your next court date--every Monday they terrorize me by dragging me in to read me the riot act of telling me to appear next Monday, an extension of torture--or I'll have the police come get you. You understand, you squashed cabbage leaf?"  This is how they used to talk.  I thought, wonder what they're hatching now, because they almost had me George Floyd murdered).  She said,  "you understand, you can now no longer be jailed," we'll only wring the last shekel out of you for trimming the trees you planted (in other words, I'm still on the hook for the $100,000)--they have to do this because it's all that's left without exposing themselves as utterly depraved despots who almost murdered an American citizen for what they now admit were lies--mouse click if you still haven't taken leave of your senses--"aren't you pleased?"   I'm not, I said, I want my jury back, so re-up the charges.   Can you up the charges so I can re-qualify for a jury trial, I said?  She looked at the State Attorney and said mournfully, "you no longer qualify."  They know if they allow a jury to hear this depravity it would impact far beyond this area (this couldn't happen in Pyongyang) because by now every branch of the South Dakota Government stands to be dragged in.  She seemed confused, because she's used to hearing a "whoosh" of relief from the condemned when their crimes are reduced.  No,  I said, I don't want my crimes reduced, put them back up.   "Restate the original,” I insisted.  The judge was bewildered that anyone would want the weightier charges reinstated (potential jail), for now they can no longer jail me.  “I want my jury trial back,  the State promised me a jury trial.”  I was almost shouting at that point.   I can’t wait for the trial.  I always show up with my big Bible, so (three times now they ran me through the wwringerringer, and now it’s heh, heh let’s get this over with) they know what to expect, and I have no intention of holding back.  I'm praying for a large audience in the galley (Courtrooms have pews where the Public can watch any of this any day of the week--if you like watching humans shiver in fear, this is for you.  Hangings and burnings used to be State holidays--if you like seeing the terrified mouse under the cat's paw, this is for you.  Utterly without human feeling or mercy from the hangmen--you will not see a single rich person there).  “They beat us openly being Romans,"  and they know they cannot let the public hear what I have to say.   "You can still make your case," she said, " but I will be the only jury."  I thank her for the warning.  Out West we call this a Hanging Judge.  Can you believe this?   If you read the Warrant you see that it is the State that accuses me.  And now,  she says, the State alone will seal my fate, because she is the State--so here I am at the mercy of a hanging judge.  These people wouldn't recognize the Constitution from My Kampf, and it wouldn't matter if they did, because the end result would be the same, and your odds would be better in Pyongyang.  This is why the Founders created the jury system, because the State cannot be trusted to do anything but look out for the despots who man the State, and I was going to put the State on trial in front of a jury, and so the State decided that it alone will my jury.  What am I to do now?   I was going to put the Government on trial before a jury of 12 ordinary citizens.   The Government, knowing the explosive outcome,  now changed the rules to prevent me from doing that by replacing the Jury with-- (wait for it) "itself."  And the jury (now the judge--if you can believe this comedy of depravity) is the State which I was about to expose.  This is what they are afraid of.  And now I'm in the hands of a hanging judge.  "Trust me,"  she seemed to say.  I.  DO.  NOT.  (in the coming days, I'll make sure she reads all this).   As God now gives me strength I hope to show up with ox-goad and jawbone.   I was hoping for a 12 member jury so as to “bow myself against the pillars,”  for which I was ready.   But God will provide occasion as it suits His purpose.   I'm sending this to all the fatcat lawyers (there should be enough lawsuits here for everyone) and worthless newspapers in South Dakota to get them to attend the trial.  They'll never forget it--that much I can assure them.   I want that place packed.   I'll be up there with my open Bible as always.  You should have seen the look on their faces when I walked in front of the judge, casually opened my Bible and only then looked her straight in the eye--right over my Bible.  I thought they would all  give a loud shriek, vacate the building, declare a lockdown,  and call in the bomb squad.  That place swarms with police--it looks like an armed camp--and they looked at my Bible fearfully as if I was carrying some sort of device.  I sensed that the judge, the first time I did this, took it as an intolerable piece of deliberate effrontery,  and I was fully aware that she would make me pay dearly for my insolence.  (These judges have supreme command of that Court Room, and the police are at hand to make sure you understand that at all times--fatcat lawyers do nothing but grovel the whole time they're there--and they do not like to be challenged or interrupted in their proud robes, and they have a policemen with a gun not far from you.  I was respectful, but I demanded clarity, and that forcefully).  All three times now, I think everyone in the courtroom, except the drunks and immigrants whom they shake down every Monday (it's the most depraved thing you've ever seen--$1000 dollar fine--ka-ching-- reduced--heh,heh-- to $500--ka-ching--, 30 days in jail, suspended-heh,heh--provided you pay the fine today--heh, heh--ka-ching, ka-ching) were scared out of their wits that I would begin preaching.  Most of the shakedowns are poor immigrants,  who probable drink to dull their misery to begin with.  And all done "decently and in order,"  an outpost of Hell.  Your sympathy would not be with the henchmen.      

earlier updates here